I spent two decades as an interior architect.
In that time, one client question stayed with me longer than almost any other.
We were deep into a project brief when they asked: “Should we go zen? It’s minimal, so it should cost less, right?”
I had to stop them there.
Zen isn’t a style. It’s not a look you choose from a reference folder. It’s a way of living. A commitment to spaces where nothing accumulates, where every object has already justified its presence, where there is simply nothing left to be there without reason.
https://www.keijidesign.com/en/works/azabu-hills-residence/
Most people aren’t actually prepared to live that way. And that’s fine. But it changes the brief entirely.
Because when you truly commit to that kind of space, the design gets harder, not easier. Every joint is exposed. Every line is read on its own. There’s nothing to hide behind. A detail that would disappear inside a busier room becomes the only thing in the room.
ps://neie.jp/concept/design_concept/
Zen doesn’t cost less. It costs more. In craft, in discipline, in the willingness to keep removing until what remains can carry the weight of being seen.
That conversation was over ten years ago. It still shapes how I think about objects today.
It’s also the one Abhinc starts from. Not minimal as aesthetic. Minimal as discipline. Objects that have already answered for themselves.
If this resonates, Studio Notes is where I think out loud about objects, space, and what earns its place. Sign up there, and follow me on Threads for the ongoing conversation.